Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| nshd:dsctte [21/05/2019 @ 09:00] – adammoore | nshd:dsctte [23/05/2023 @ 13:04] (current) – director | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | [[: | ||
| ==== NSHD Data Sharing Committee ==== | ==== NSHD Data Sharing Committee ==== | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
| All proposals are considered by members of the LHA/NSHD Data | All proposals are considered by members of the LHA/NSHD Data | ||
| Sharing Committee and by specialist reviewers if necessary. Proposals are considered by | Sharing Committee and by specialist reviewers if necessary. Proposals are considered by | ||
| - | the LHA/NSHD Data Sharing Committee on a monthly | + | the LHA/NSHD Data Sharing Committee on a regular |
| As a general guideline, successful research proposals meet the following criteria: | As a general guideline, successful research proposals meet the following criteria: | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
| \\ \\ | \\ \\ | ||
| - | === Rejected proposals and appeals procedure | + | |
| - | In the unusual situation that the LHA/NSHD Data Sharing Committee cannot immediatley | + | === Facilitated collaborations |
| - | approve a proposal, the external researcher can appeal, in the first instance | + | |
| - | of the LHA. The Director may decide to grant the appeal or to refer it to an external | + | |
| - | independent body. Full details of the appeals procedure will | + | |
| - | be supplied to the applicants should this prove necessary. | + | |
| Facilitated collaborations are required in the following circumstances and | Facilitated collaborations are required in the following circumstances and | ||
| Line 50: | Line 45: | ||
| * Proposals requiring access to data or meta-data that have not yet been through vigorous quality assurance protocols in place and will require a significant amount of time to check and/or clean | * Proposals requiring access to data or meta-data that have not yet been through vigorous quality assurance protocols in place and will require a significant amount of time to check and/or clean | ||
| * Proposals requiring access to extensive biomedical data | * Proposals requiring access to extensive biomedical data | ||
| - | * Proposals from researchers outside | + | |
| + | \\ | ||
| + | === Rejected proposals and appeals procedure === | ||
| + | In the unusual situation that the LHA/NSHD Data Sharing Committee cannot | ||
| + | approve a proposal, the external researcher can appeal, in the first instance | ||
| + | of the LHA. The Director may decide to grant the appeal or to refer it to an external | ||
| + | independent body. Full details of the appeals procedure will | ||
| + | be supplied to the applicants should this prove necessary. | ||