Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| nshd:dsctte [20/03/2018 @ 09:48] – adammoore | nshd:dsctte [20/03/2018 @ 09:53] – adammoore | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| [[: | [[: | ||
| - | |||
| ==== NSHD Data Sharing Committee ==== | ==== NSHD Data Sharing Committee ==== | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| === The review process === | === The review process === | ||
| All proposals are considered by members of the LHA/NSHD Data | All proposals are considered by members of the LHA/NSHD Data | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
| As a general guideline, successful research proposals meet the following criteria: | As a general guideline, successful research proposals meet the following criteria: | ||
| - | * No breach of confidence should be incurred. | + | * No breach of confidence should be incurred |
| - | * The use of the data should be within the bounds of consent given by cohort members, and comply with MRC guidance on ethics and research governance. | + | * The use of the data should be within the bounds of consent given by cohort members, and comply with MRC guidance on ethics and research governance |
| - | * There should be no risk to the viability or reputation of the study from use of the data supplied. | + | * There should be no risk to the viability or reputation of the study from use of the data supplied |
| - | * The proposal should be from bone fide researchers working within an MRC recognised organisation who have the necessary expertise to undertake the project. In the case of students applying for access, their supervisor must be a co-applicant and ensure that appropriate academic and data security guidance are adhered to at all times. | + | * The proposal should be from bone fide researchers working within an MRC recognised organisation who have the necessary expertise to undertake the project. In the case of students applying for access, their supervisor must be a co-applicant and ensure that appropriate academic and data security guidance are adhered to at all times |
| - | Researchers are encouraged to view the list of previously approved data sharing proposals | + | Researchers are encouraged to view the [[approved|list of previously approved data sharing proposals]] |
| to assess points of similarity or overlap with already existing projects. | to assess points of similarity or overlap with already existing projects. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
| may be subject to a charge to cover the additional costs incurred by the LHA. Any such | may be subject to a charge to cover the additional costs incurred by the LHA. Any such | ||
| costs will be notified in advance. | costs will be notified in advance. | ||
| + | \\ \\ | ||
| - | ==== Correspondence and timings for review of submissions | + | === Correspondence and timings for review of submissions === |
| Receipt of your application will be notified using the email address you supplied. If you have | Receipt of your application will be notified using the email address you supplied. If you have | ||
| not received an electronic confirmation of your submission within 10 working days please | not received an electronic confirmation of your submission within 10 working days please | ||
| - | contact swiftinfo@nshd.mrc.ac.uk. | + | contact |
| The LHA/NSHD Data Sharing Committee meets once a month to assess all new applications | The LHA/NSHD Data Sharing Committee meets once a month to assess all new applications | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| upon the timing of the original proposal in relation to the meetings. Applicants will be | upon the timing of the original proposal in relation to the meetings. Applicants will be | ||
| notified by email if their application to use the data will be delayed beyond these time lines. | notified by email if their application to use the data will be delayed beyond these time lines. | ||
| + | \\ \\ | ||
| === Rejected proposals and appeals procedure === | === Rejected proposals and appeals procedure === | ||